Tuesday, February 22, 2005
GEORGE Bush has banned Camilla Parker Bowles from the White House - because she is a divorcee.
The unprecedented snub has effectively sabotaged Charles's plan to take his bride on a Royal tour of America later this year.
The trip would have been the pair's first official tour as a married couple.
But the US President - a notoriously right-wing Christian and reformed alcoholic - told aides it was "inappropriate" for him to be playing host to the newly-weds, who are both divorcees.
The decision was made even though the late President Ronald Reagan was divorced.
A Government insider said: "It was relayed to us from Washington that Mrs Parker Bowles would not be welcome at the White House.
"The Americans are aware that the visit will be subject to a lot of media attention and did not want the President drawn into what they view to be a public relations exercise.
At least we can be reasonably certain they wouldn't trash the White House garden.
|
Monday, February 21, 2005
As George W. Bush was first moving onto the national political stage, he often turned for advice to an old friend who secretly taped some of their private conversations, creating a rare record of the future president as a politician and a personality.
In the last several weeks, that friend, Doug Wead, an author and former aide to Mr. Bush's father, disclosed the tapes' existence to a reporter and played about a dozen of them.
As much as I dislike Dubya and would like to see him totally disgraced and run out of office, I dislike this taping just as much.
Yes, I know it was perfectly legal - the "friend" took pains to make sure he was taping in a locale where it wasn't against the law.
Did I read the transcripts? Of course I did - I'm no saint; just a typical human being who rubbernecks at car accidents and can't resist anything scandalous.
I can't imagine what benefit any of my friends would get from taping conversations with me, but I do know one thing...that friend would be quickly moved from my friend list to my sh$t list.
I asked myself - "under what circumstances would I tape conversations with a friend, without that friend's knowledge?"
I can think of only one circumstance - if I believed the "friend" was preparing to stab me or mine in the back, and I wanted evidence to prevent it.
Wead does refer to something similar -
Mr. Wead said he recorded his conversations with the president in part because he thought he might be asked to write a book for the campaign. He also wanted a clear account of any requests Mr. Bush made of him. But he said his main motivation in making the tapes, which he originally intended to be released only after his own death, was to leave the nation a unique record of Mr. Bush.
As a former aide to Bush The Smarter, Wead would surely have realized how highly the Bush family prizes loyalty. If he hoped to get anything at all from them, it would have been better to wait for his own death to release the tapes.
However, Dubya should cheer up - it could be worse.
Paris Hilton, whose T-Mobile Sidekick account was hacked, saw her private information spread around the internet.
In a masterful piece of logic, a source close to Hilton said - "She was pretty upset about it. It's one thing to have people looking at your sex tapes, but having people reading your personal e-mails is a real invasion of privacy."
Let's all hope private conversations were the only thing Wead taped.
|
Over at dailyKos, k9 disc gives us a very moving photographic tribute to the faces of Social Security.
The Social Security debate may be about dollars and cents, but it is, at it’s very core, about people - their lives, their accomplishments, and their dreams.

This is my mother.

She's 90 years old, and has been widowed for the last five years.
She worked until she was married in 1949, and then became a full-time mother and wife.
At the time her husband (my father) passed away, she personally was receiving only about $200 per month from Social Security. Obviously, she couldn't live on that amount; it wouldn't cover her basic utility bills.
One of the complaints about Social Security is that it can't be passed on. But guess what? - it can. It happens every day, and has been passed on to beneficiaries for seventy years.
Based on my father's Social Security benefits, she currently receives $949.00 per month. As his widow, part of his benefits automatically passed on to her.
And if she wishes to save or invest any part of that monthly $949.00 and pass it on to her descendants, that's perfectly legal, too.


This is my mother's sister. She's about 86 years old, and has never voted for a Democrat in her life.
She rails against Democrats because they take her money and give it to "welfare queens".
She raised eight children and her husband was a farmer; she worked side-by-side with him in the tobacco, milking cows, collecting eggs, and then feeding everyone.
She never received a dime's wage for her lifelong labor, but when her husband died about fifteen years ago, she also began to receive a goodly portion of his Social Security benefits.
I asked her once if she had considered returning it, since she "didn't believe" in paying Social Security taxes. I escaped with my life.
For many years, Social Security has been there for those who have gone before us - whether they wanted it or not. It has been there for those who appreciated it, and for those who despise it.
And it's been passed on to those who need it.
If anything is worth saving and strenthening, as an invaluable insurance, not as an "investment", it's Social Security.
|
Sunday, February 20, 2005
Saturday, February 19, 2005
There will be a test later; a hint at the end of the post. Don't worry, it should be easy.
Question: While there are a couple of good ideas here, which one sentence capsulizes everything that is wrong with this plan and most others on the table?
Spot the sentence, and win a big "attaboy" from me.
Bill would require all Californians to have insurance
If you drive a car, the law requires you to have auto insurance. By the same token, shouldn't the state also force you to have health insurance?
That's the thinking behind legislation expected to be introduced this week that would require Californians to carry basic health insurance. Those who failed to comply would have their wages garnisheed or lose their tax refunds.
The bill's authors, Assemblymen Joe Nation, D-San Rafael, and Keith Richman, R-Northridge (Los Angeles County), hope a mandate will reduce cost burdens both on those who are already insured and on the doctors and hospitals that care for the uninsured.
"We believe a basic level of health care is a right, but we also believe it's a responsibility of individuals to take care of themselves and not be in a position where they require society to pay for the cost of their emergency room visit," Nation said.
Instead of making employers pick up the health insurance tab, the bill by Nation and Richman would put the responsibility on individuals.
While Nation acknowledged that affordability is a key problem, he also said that many young people don't have insurance because they think they can get away without it.
Unlike single-payer plans, such as one proposed by state Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, Nation and Richman's approach relies greatly on the insurance industry. Their plan addresses the affordability issue by streamlining the enrollment process for government health programs for the poor, including Medi-Cal and Healthy Families.
In addition, it would provide subsidies to help low-income people who do not qualify for Medi-Cal buy insurance.
|
Count me among those who believe the end times are a-comin’.
No, I don’t believe in Dubya the Messiah; I don’t even think he’s the Anti-Christ, though it’s tempting.
The efforts of the fundies and neocons to drum up Armageddon are in vain; as the Gospel of Matthew tells us - ”Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.”
How do I know the end approacheth?
For the first time in about eight years, my morning email inbox contained no offers of prescription drugs without prescription, no offers of knock-off Rolex watches, no cheap software, no winning international lottery notifications, no letters from African barristers in need of assistance, no once-in-a-lifetime offers from hot chicks, nor promises of super-Viagra.
Has my Mailwasher finally deleted and bounced so many of those messages that they’ve finally gotten the hint?
I don’t think so.
Obviously, I am one of the Chosen who will be swept off to heaven while the rest of you poor slobs are consumed in the fires of hell.
Update - I spoke too soon. Dr. Paul Emeka of Nigeria, personal financial advisor to the late head of state, humbly requests my assistance investing funds in the United States, as he is unable to leave his country.
Back to the drawing board, but it was nice while it lasted.
|
Friday, February 18, 2005
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a possible White House candidate in 2008, joined 2004 nominee John Kerry and other Democrats Thursday in urging that Election Day be made a federal holiday to encourage voting.
But I'd like to see a couple of measure put into place first:
Let's agree that any voting holiday will take place on ONE day in the MIDDLE of the work week. No fair switching it to a Monday or Friday when part of the electorate will give up their right to vote for a three-day holiday getaway.
Can we also get some legislation forbidding the sale of Happy Voting Day cards or Voting Day Sales?
If some people want to put up Voting Day trees in their homes or create quaint Voting Day holiday traditions, it's their own business. The line must be drawn, however, at any tradition involving hiding the ballots.
Republicans should love this, since the fundamentalist Christians can turn it into a God Bless Republican America Day on the Sunday before official Voting Day.
However, Dubya would probably have mixed emotions; he'd hate the idea of giving federal workers another day off, but love the idea of tossing away more taxpayer money.
It should also be noted that very few federal holidays are actually observed by private enterprise. The last time I got President's Day off was when I was in high school.
I'd actually prefer that tried-and-true, all-American custom for getting people to turn out - provide refreshments and charge for it. Maybe throw in a bake sale or raffle.
|
Looks like GannonGate might finally be growing some legs, and you can always go to AMERICAblog for all the Guckert/Gannon news.
One thing I wish all the media types would get through their heads - it’s not about someone’s private life.
Who knows or cares what he does in his private life? Does he watch TV? Play Solitaire? Walk the dog? Visit his mother?
What we DO know is what he did in his occupations, which are NOT his “private life”. He was a fake reporter and a member of the world’s oldest profession; either are fair game.
I don’t remember anyone complaining about intrusions into Heidi Fleiss or Christine Keeler’s private life; the media fell all over themselves to give us every juicy detail.
And maybe we are beginning to understand what Dubya was thinking when he talked about a “ManDate”. If he cared to accept it, he had one waltzing in and out of the White House for several years.
|
Thursday, February 17, 2005
Never fear, Dubya still managed to find a photo op; with little brown ones, even.For President Bush Social Security reform tops a busy second-term agenda, but yesterday's stop on his campaign-style reform push brought little more than a collective ho-hum from Granite Staters.
White House aides collected empty chairs in an echoing Pease International Tradeport hangar before Bush took the stage since only about half of the 2,000 free tickets were taken.

|
Get out your latest Social Security benefit estimate statement and start calculating.
Here is the Social Insecurity Card calculator, via TPM
If we take the plunge into privatized accounts, this household will lose $1,196 per year – almost $100 per month – as opposed to the estimated benefits under the dreary, unexciting Social Security program of the past.
Wow, where do I sign up?
|
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
"Certainly the personal account doesn't fix the system. There needs to be better reforms, more meaningful reforms than that."
|
Given the Bush administration’s penchant for throwing good money at bad programs (previously known as the Great Slander Against The Democratic Party) and their zeal for twisting science, I hate to see something like this:
Flu shots of little use to elderly, U.S. study shows
A new study based on more than three decades of U.S. data suggests that giving flu shots to the elderly has not saved any lives.
Most of the 36,000 people who die each year of flu-related causes are elderly and the nation's strategy has focused on getting shots to them, as well as other high-risk groups.
Before anyone in the Bush administration gets any ideas about wiping out federal funding for the CDC, I hope they’ll consider how many dollars are saved by a simple flu shot.
Since we’re talking about the elderly, we have to talk Medicare. How many Medicare dollars are spent on flu-related visits to the doctor or hospital admissions? Could those dollars have been saved by a simple and inexpensive annual flu shot?
The study goes on to suggest a more effective way of preventing the spread of the flu would be mass vaccinations of school-age children.
Ira Longini, biostatistics professor at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health and a proponent of vaccinating schoolchildren says:
if 70 per cent of schoolchildren were vaccinated, the elderly would be protected without flu shots. The strategy would require 42 million doses of flu vaccine. Even during this season's shortage, there were 57 million doses available.
Maybe the Bush administration could be persuaded to include "flu prevention" in the flush-with-funds abstinence-only education program, instructing children to wash hands frequently and abstaining from coughing or sneezing in someone else's face.
|
Time for all good Americans to put on their tee shirts?U.S. intelligence officials warned Wednesday that the threat of al Qaeda or other terrorist groups attacking the United States was still imminent and likely would be in the form of a car bomb or other low-tech weapon.

I'm asking Santa for the full set.
|
I’ve always thought Syria was next on the neocon hit-list; it makes more sense than Iran, as Syria doesn’t have a nuclear weapon, can’t fight back effectively, and provides a “target-rich” environment that would entice any bully.
The Syrian government hasn’t exactly been the good guys; the late Hafez Assad made Saddam look like a kindly old grandfather.
The heir, Bashir, has generally kept his head down, but Syria needs to get their butts out of Lebanon and let the Lebanese take care of their own business.
But is Syria behind Hariri’s assassination? I haven’t the faintest idea, and I am fully confident the Bush administration hasn’t the faintest idea either, despite recalling the ambassador and Condi’s threats:
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Tuesday Syria was "unfortunately on a path right now where relations are not improving, but are worsening."
Rice did not blame Syria for Monday's bomb attack that, but she did challenge Syria's long-standing claim that its troops were needed in Lebanon to provide security.
"There is no doubt that the conditions created by Syria's presence there have created a destabilized situation in Lebanon," she said.
In a thinly-veiled jab at Washington, he said accusations that Syria is supporting terrorism are akin to claims, later disproved, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction in the lead-up to the war.
And as we've all learned, there's nothing more irresistable to the neocons than an al-Queda carrot.
|
I had planned to spend the evening doing some exciting, thrill-a-minute live-blogging of the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, but was distracted when one of my own dogs developed a case of diarrhea.
At such times, I’m grateful I have Chihuahuas and not Great Danes.
I shoveled some Pepto Bismol into the dog, cleaned up the mess(es), sat back down just in time to see “Best In Show” and just in time to wonder why a damned rolling dust-mop Pekinese won the Toy Division…..again.
Here is a Chihuahua –


Here is a Pekinese –

Roomba! 
I don't know what these judges are thinking.
|
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
Bush has finally learned that "Sometimes, words have consequences you don't intend them to mean," but it doesn't seem to have sunk in that actions have consequences as well.
The “small business friendly” Bush administration has what they think is a great idea to make health care insurance more affordable for small businesses and the self-employed:
The President has also signed into law health savings accounts (HSAs), which combine low-cost, high-deductible health insurance with tax-free savings accounts to pay for health care expenses and save for future medical needs.
New health plans worsen hospitals' bad debt
Because many new health plans carry higher deductibles, Baptist Health South Florida has found it more difficult to collect on its debts from patients.
The south Miami-Dade County nonprofit hospital system piled up $131 million in bad debt in 2004, an increase of 254 percent from 1999. With high-deductible health savings accounts (HSAs) being introduced with President George W. Bush's backing and studies showing employers shifting more health care costs to workers, Baptist and other Florida hospitals worry that the stack of unpaid bills will only grow higher.
"We see over time that, as patients are required to pay more out of pocket, our bad debt goes up," said Eric Shatanof, Baptist's corporate VP for managed care and network development. "There are a large percentage of the patient portions that people just don't pay."
The patient is suffering, the hospitals are suffering, and employers are suffering.
The only group feeling no pain is the Bush administration, with their short-sighted, underfunded, “quick-fix” schemes.
|
If the guy hadn't changed his name and registered on gay porn sites, this would have been one of the dullest hullabaloos of all time. And besides, let he who has never registered with a gay military porn site under a different name cast the first stone.CRASH
(sound of stone crashing through window)
Do tell, Jonah.
Monday, February 14, 2005
Roses are red
Violets are blue
I'm still paying off Christmas,
How about you?
|
John Aravosis has burned up the internets on the trail of GannonGate, and it ain't purty.
It's not about the sex...it's about security clearance, background checks - and above all, who waved him through.
|
Feb. 14, 2005 - NY Times
U.S. Missile Defense System Flunks Test
Again.
Why am I not surprised?
|
A security screener at Newark Liberty International Airport failed to spot a butcher knife in a passenger's pocketbook and was removed from the post for retraining, officials said.
Katrina Bell, 27, had cleared security and was waiting with her sister to board a flight on Saturday morning when she discovered she was carrying a knife.
Bell had put the knife in her bag "just in case" before going on a blind date earlier that week, her sister and travel companion, Tikisha Bell Gowens, 30, said in The Sunday Star-Ledger of Newark.
"She said to me, 'Oh my God, I have this butcher knife in my pocketbook,'" Bell Gowens said. "My first thought was, 'They're going to think we're terrorists.'"
The North Carolina women immediately told airport personnel, who summoned police and officials of the Transportation Security Administration, which employs the screeners.
The women were not charged.
The screener was removed from the checkpoint and will undergo remedial training, TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis said.
Let’s skip over the North Carolina woman’s reason for packing a butcher knife – she was going on a blind date, and was carrying it “just in case”.
Any woman who accepts a blind date with a man likely to need discouraging with a butcher knife is desperate at best and maybe should be on the "No Fly" list.
I just happen to own an honest-to-goodness butcher knife, courtesy of my cousin the butcher.
It’s at least a foot of wickedly sharp, curved steel sharpened to a razor-fine point, and responsible for at least two trips to the emergency room.
In fact, the butcher cousin gave all his female relatives butcher knives one Christmas, and the stories are legion. I’m willing to bet there are at least a dozen trips to emergency rooms and clinics between us, and probably a hundred stitches. One cousin suggested we start a class-action suit.
A butcher knife would have to be in a large, strong protective sheath if you didn't want a severed hand every time you reached into your purse.
How an airport screening missed it or how the woman forgot she was packing it is totally beyond me.
Maybe the lesson we can take away from the incident is twofold - avoid flying in or out of Newark airport, and think twice before making a blind date with a North Carolina woman.
|
It's hard to decide on a gift for a man who has everything, but I've finally picked out the perfect Valentine's Day surprise.
Bob, honey - you'll find it on the sidebar to the right, just below the blue "There Is No Crisis" logo.
(By the way, Bob, there is no crisis)
When Novak warns Democrats not to choose Howard Dean as chairman of the DNC, you know The Doctor is the right man for the job.
|
Sunday, February 13, 2005
Don’t look now, but while the Bushies are making threatening noises at Iran and fumbling around in Iraq, there have been some positive moves toward dealing with the fundamental cause behind Islamist terrorism.
There was no “shock and awe”, no meddling from the neo-cons, and no threats from the White House.
The new Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, said in an interview this weekend that the war with the Israelis is effectively over and that the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, is speaking "a different language" to the Palestinians. Mr. Sharon's commitment to withdraw from Gaza and dismantle all Israeli settlements there and four in the West Bank, despite "how much pressure is on him from the Israeli Likud rightists," Mr. Abbas said, "is a good sign to start with" on the road to real peace.
"And now he has a partner," Mr. Abbas said.
(snip)
Mr. Abbas said the war with the Israelis would be over "when the Israelis declare that they will comply with the agreement I made in Sharm el Sheik, and today our comrades in Hamas and Jihad said they are committed to the truce, the cooling down of the whole situation, and I believe we will start a new era."
Fighting the war on terrorism with diplomacy and the ballot box....what a concept.
|
Writing for Agape Press (“All the News That’s Holy Enough To Print”), Matt Friedman relates a story from a caller to his radio show.
On the program that day we were discussing the report that some Europeans were disgusted with the Super Bowl commercial of American soldiers getting applause in an airport. The critics thought it too extreme in its patriotism and a possible incitement to further war.
I’m glad the crowd applauded. I would, too.
I would applaud their courage and devotion to duty when charged with carrying out insane policy.
What Friedman and others like him don’t understand is that we would like the opportunity to applaud those who are too seriously wounded to walk through an airport.
We’d like the opportunity to honor those who return to American soil in flag-draped caskets. And we'd like to see more sensible policy that would enable them to come home in one piece.
As long as those who left life or limb in Iraq are treated like a dirty secret, you bet we'll be disgusted with hollow patriotism and false shows of "support" for the troops.
|
Saturday, February 12, 2005
…because Dr. Steven E. Olchowski now practices in Iona, Michigan.
This isn’t a life-threatening case, but it still deserves attention.
Eight medical malpractice lawsuits have been filed by patients who said a doctor at New Hanover Regional Medical Center performed one type of gastric bypass when they had agreed to a different one.
(snip)
The lawsuits claim that Olchowski told patients he would perform a surgery called Roux-en-Y, but instead performed a minigastric bypass.
Both types of surgery make the stomach smaller and allow food to bypass part of the small intestine. Patients thus feel full more quickly and, by bypassing part of the intestine, fewer calories are absorbed and weight loss is achieved. The difference between the two surgeries is how the stomach and intestines are attached.
Health insurance often covers Roux-en-Y, which costs about $25,000, while it does not cover minigastric bypass, which costs $15,000 to $20,000, in North Carolina.
Attorneys Jennifer Umbaugh and Melissa Pollock, who represent six of the patients, said their clients had serious complications from the minigastric bypass, such as stomach ulcers and continual nausea and vomiting. All of them had a second surgery to convert the bypass into a Roux-en-Y.
(snip)
Olchowski, 57, resigned from New Hanover Regional's medical staff July 1, 2003. He now practices general surgery at Ionia County Memorial Hospital in Michigan.
An incompetent physician doesn’t become competent simply by moving to another state. It’s not a matter of “state’s rights”.
Until we have some sort of national standards and physicians and hospitals start turning these guys in, we can’t get a handle on malpractice lawsuits.
Memo to Dubya – let’s fix this problem before we start curtailing a patient’s right to sue a butcher.
|
Friday, February 11, 2005
I grew up with all the “Who will Prince Charles marry?” speculation that began about two seconds after his birth.
From that moment on, it was a requirement that every magazine in the world run a yearly article naming suitable young ladies, with much sorrowful head-shaking over Princess Caroline of Monaco’s Catholicism.
I quite vividly remember the day Prince Charles was invested as Prince of Wales; kneeling in front of the Queen amidst the spectacular pile of Caernarfon Castle. The 21-year-old prince looked a lot like Alfred E. Newman, and that silly crown didn’t help – nonetheless, he appeared resolved to do his duty. I began to have my doubts he would consider marrying an American commoner.
Because just like many other little girls, I knew for certain I would some day be the one waving from the palace balcony. It really didn’t matter that the years didn’t do much to dispel the Alfred E. Newman look; he was a prince and rich and famous, and everything I deserved.
I would have been a spectacular Princess of Wales. Naturally, the British public would have been at once horrified and fascinated with the idea of an uncommon American commoner Princess, but my brilliant wit and gracious smile would have won them over quite easily. The press would have adored me; most especially when I tripped over my own two feet in public and provided them with many other such endearing “she’s just like us!” moments.
The years flew by; the names and faces of potential brides went by the wayside. I even remember the name “Camilla Shand” from somewhere, but Charles was obviously saving himself for me.
It eventually dawned on me that becoming the Princess of Wales meant sleeping with the Prince; however, by that time the artificial insemination folks were making great advances, so it seemed nothing stood in my way.
Then came the evil day when the engagement to Lady Diana Spencer was announced. How dare he?
Actually, at the time, I had given up my fantasies and was married for the second time. But that didn’t stop me from thinking “That hussy!”
More years have gone by; “that hussy” – lovely, gentle, willful as she was – is tragically dead. Charles’ relationship with Camilla is about to be legalized.
Some elements of the British public disapprove of the marriage, but I say to them – “Come on, folks; give the poor guy a break”.
He deserves some happiness. After all, he missed his chance with me.
|
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Scottie McClelland, answering the question "Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?":
Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.
Hell, I've got a full name, a Social Security number, and a birth date - I've even got a pseudonym and a blog.
I should have no trouble crashing Scottie's gaggle parties.
|
Secretary of state says Iran could be referred to Security Council
”And I think everybody understands what the 'next steps' mean," Rice told reporters after a meeting with NATO foreign ministers and European Union officials.
Since everybody and his brother knows Condi's opinion of the United Nations and the Security Council, there's no doubt she's referring to Shock 'n' Awe.
But who, Condi? You and what army? Rummy’s clandestine spook-army? The Boy Scouts?
Now all Iran has to do is stir up (or continue to stir up) trouble in Iraq and keep our troops occupied with that mess.
Condi 0, Iran 1....forfeited by ignorance and arrogance.
|
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Privatizers say the trust fund doesn't count because it's invested in U.S. government bonds, which are "meaningless i.o.u.'s."
Some in our country think that Social Security is a trust fund -- in other words, there's a pile of money being accumulated. That's just simply not true. The money -- payroll taxes going into the Social Security are spent. They're spent on benefits and they're spent on government programs. There is no trust. We're on the ultimate pay-as-you-go system -- what goes in comes out. And so, starting in 2018, what's going in -- what's coming out is greater than what's going in. It says we've got a problem. And we'd better start dealing with it now. The longer we wait, the harder it is to fix the problem.
I'm totally out of my element here; what possible benefit could come from a default?
Is it "Plan B", ready to be implemented if Dubya's privatization sales pitch fails?
But what else would happen? Maybe martial law?
I googled "default treasury bond", and instantly came up with this post. It's a bit lengthy for copy/paste, and should be read in it's entirety.
I wish I hadn't read it right before bedtime.
|
Dubya brings the Destroy Social Security Road Show to Raleigh, NC on Thursday, and the Raleigh News and Observer seems to have his number-
President Bush is coming to Raleigh on Thursday and bringing along U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole as an example of the rare politician who won office while pledging to change Social Security.
And, no way am I for privatizing Social Security. I support the concept of allowing workers to contribute small portions of their own Social Security in the market because it would negate the need to nearly double payroll taxes on future workers to fund benefits.
Someone should tell Bush that when Liddy spoke about Social Security during her campaign she always emphasized the first part of that statement, played down the second, and accused Erskine Bowles of not having any plan. But I give her full credit for at least using the term "privatizing".
Just about the only way we can get Liddy to visit North Carolina is when Dubya drags her back here, but we'll leave that without comment and move on.
The few winger acquaintances I've had occasion to speak with are expressing similar sentiments..."Social Security is DOOMED, it was DOOMED from the beginning, it's a Communist plot, Bush is a Man of God, but Congress better not take away a penny of my benefits", often with a few four-letter words thrown in for better effect.
The News & Observer continues -
Bush will be host for an hourlong conversation with business leaders, seniors and young people who support his plan
How about our congressional delegation?
But he picks a state where five of the seven Republican U.S. House members are lukewarm on the idea -- at best.
Only Reps. Sue Myrick of Charlotte and Patrick McHenry of Cherryville favor the accounts.
The others? Not sure. They are getting mail and calls from people who are worried about Social Security, especially the 900,000 members of the state AARP, most of whom worry that change would mean reduced benefits.
Rep. Howard Coble of Greensboro said he finds the idea of personal accounts "inoffensive" but does not see the system as in crisis.
Rep. Walter Jones of Farmville said he'll wait and see what comes out of Congress.
Even Rep. Virginia Foxx of Banner Elk, who praised Bush's State of the Union address as magnificent, is not sold on private accounts.
(snip)
Among the last to hear about Bush's visit were Reps. Bob Etheridge, Brad Miller and David Price, the three Democratic House members who represent the Triangle. They had not received tickets as of late Tuesday.
|
I was unexpectedly busy being a birthday girl yesterday; a car pulled into the driveway, and out popped the kid with a bouquet of roses. Her last class of the day was cancelled, so she decided to surprise me with a birthday vist. Excellent added incentive for going out to dinner and enjoying a margarita. Or two.
But I wasn't too busy to notice the results of a CNN/Gallup poll -
More than two-thirds of 1,010 adults contacted from Friday to Sunday said it would be a good idea to limit benefits for wealthier retirees and for higher income workers to pay Social Security taxes on all their wages.
Have you played the Social Security Game from The American Academy of Actuaries?
"Popping the cap" on wages subject to Social Security tax nets you a 77% out of 100% on the solve-the-immediate-problem scale.
Reducing benefits for those whose total retirement income exceeds $50,000 per year gets you a 75% score.
Neither solution solves the long-term problem by itself, but as the poll indicates two-thirds of those polled don't need to take the test to know where the solutions lie.
I'd suggest someone bring the test to Dubya's attention, but as everyone knows he glories in having been a "C" student.
|
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
How did I miss this? I guess "strict interpretation of the Constitution" only applies to judges.
In The House of Representatives
January 4, 2005
Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification.
|
I’m getting really good at turning 39, so I thought a review of other years containing a “9” might be in order.
Chapter One
Nine years old. - See picture in the sidebar to the right. Funny looking, gap-toothed kid. Amateur beautician mother tormented me and my naturally straight hair with frizzy permanents and dressed me funny.
I was a pretty good baseball player (softball is for wimps!), but limited equality for the sexes meant it would be many years later before I could play on an organized team. By then, I was too old, fat, and lazy.
Chapter Two
Nineteen years old. - (Picture here). Goofing my way through college, and embarking on a disastrous relationship. Big, fat whitebread wedding.
Chapter Three
Twenty-nine years old - After suffering through seven-plus years of physical, emotional, and verbal abuse, we divorced quite un-amicably.
“We”, because I gave as well as I got. But I was no match for him in the physical abuse department.
The night I woke up in the emergency room with a broken hand, I looked straight into his eyes and told him to get the hell out of my life while I still had one.
I gave up everything – house, cars, furniture, money. It was a small price to pay and worth every cent.
I rented a tiny apartment on my meager salary, bummed rides to and from work, and lived on water and peanut butter sandwiches. Couldn’t afford jelly.
On the day the divorce became final, I returned to work with the precious, hot-off-the-press divorce papers in my hand. It was lunch time, so I went to the company break room to enjoy my peanut butter sandwich. I splurged on a can of Pepsi and bag of chips to celebrate.
I was halfway through my sandwich with peanut butter smeared on my teeth when a tall, dark, handsome stranger sat down next to me. Not a total stranger; he worked in a different department and I’d seen him around, but we’d never “officially” met.
He asked me to dinner. A couple of months later we were married; we just celebrated our 26th anniversary.
You gotta know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em.
Chapter Four
Thirty-nine years old. -The American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association really should issue a recommendation advising against thirty-nine year old women attempting to raise a toddler. I’ve never been so tired in my life.
Chapter Five
Forty-nine years old - The American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association really should issue a recommendation advising against forty-nine year old women attempting to raise a teenager. I’ve never been so tired in my life.
Chapter Six?
Fifty-nine years old - I’ve got several years to go before I get there, but I hope to make it. I'm not that tired.
Speaking of hopes, how’s that diet of mine going?
You lose fourteen pounds
And what do you get?
Another year older
And deeper in debt….
Other hopes:
*Watching the kid receive her master’s degree and/or embarking on a satisfying, successful career.
*Bush and his neocon buddies thoroughly disgraced and out of office forever and ever amen.
*Peace on earth
*Good will toward men
Enough of this. I’ve got to go rest up so I can blow out all these candles.
Peace, ya'll
|
Monday, February 07, 2005
You're being screwed. Again.
NY Times- President Bush's budget would more than double the co-payment charged to many veterans for prescription drugs and would require some to pay a new fee of $250 a year for the privilege of using government health care, administration officials said Sunday.

|
Sunday, February 06, 2005
The administration has put out a lot of lame, disingenuous, smoke-and-mirrors regarding Social Security, but in my mind the most shameful has been aiding and abetting the crowd that whines - “why should I contribute MY money for these geezer’s retirement?”.
No matter how special you think you are, no matter how talented, smart or cool – not one of us arrived on earth without a lot of help from a geezer generation.
Geezers gave you birth; you were probably helped into the world by geezer doctors and nurses. The roads you traveled on your way home from the hospital were built and maintained by geezers.
The car, bus, or train that transported you was built, maintained, and driven by geezers.
The house, apartment, trailer, or shack you were brought up in was built by geezers. Geezers kept the electricity flowing, the water running, and your sewage disposed.
Somewhere, a geezer worked to put food in your mouth and clothes on your back.
Geezers changed your diapers, wiped your snotty nose, mopped up the vomit when you were sick, and toilet-trained you.
If you’re reading this, you were taught to read by a geezer. Geezers built and maintained your schools; geezers were your room mothers and den leaders, music teachers, school bus drivers, and coaches.
Geezer policemen and geezer firemen risked and often gave their lives to protect your life and property.
Geezers paid your college tuition and/or paid taxes for your grants. Your professors are geezers, and the persons who read your resume' will quite likely be geezers.
The owner of the company that pays your wages will probably be a geezer. He/She may be a disagreeable geezer, but without his/her initiative and a geezer's entrepreneurial spirit, you wouldn’t have the benefit of a paycheck.
What’s that you’re looking at? A computer monitor? You can thank the geezers for something you've probably taken for granted. Legions of geezers produced your computers and Xboxes and Ninentendos and pioneered the technology that allows you to play those games.
Listen to your favorite musical artist during an interview; most of them will credit a geezer as their inspiration. Without geezers like the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, Elvis Presley, Aretha Franklin, and the Motown crowd, you’d be chillin’ with Lawrence Welk’s champagne music.
Those great artists don’t need you contributing to their retirement, but the legion of fans who supported and encouraged their careers, bought the tickets and records – they are geezers.
And by the way – if it weren’t for the geezers, you’d still be listening to those artists on vinyl 45 and 78 rpm records. Look it up. Geezers gave you cassette tapes, then CD’s.
Certainly, the geezers have made mistakes. So will you, and so will the generation that comes after you.
Do you owe geezers anything?
No.
You owe them everything.
Rein in the attitude, and help figure out a way to make Social Security truly secure; not just for today's geezers, but for YOU when it's your turn.
|
Saturday, February 05, 2005
...the next time otherwise sensible Democrats suggest wooing John McCain as a Democratic candidate?
The six Democrats who voted to confirm Gonzales as AG should hang their heads in shame and be held accountable come re-election time.
But nobody has more to be ashamed of than John McCain.
John McCain's 5 1/2 years of captivity in North Vietnam were divided into two phases. Early on, this son and grandson of high-ranking Naval officers was accorded relatively privileged status. Then he refused early release--which he saw as a public relations stunt by his captors--insisting that POWs held longer than him should be granted their freedom first. Thereafter, McCain was treated much more severely, but he also had an opportunity to bond with his fellow prisoners. Those experiences strengthened his resolve and eased his transition back into civilian life.
The six Democrats who voted to confirm have disgraced their party and principles. McCain disgraced the uniform and experience he once wore so proudly.
|
Friday, February 04, 2005
Embarrassed by recent revelations, the Bush administration declared a moratorium on paying third-rate hacks to tout their policies.
Bush said it was an improper use of government funds, and told a news conference: "I expect my Cabinet secretaries to make sure that that practice doesn't go forward. There needs to be independence."
Or not....
Pentagon sites: Journalism or propaganda?
The sites are run by U.S. military troops trained in "information warfare," a specialty than can include battlefield deception.
(snip)
The Pentagon maintains that the information on the sites is true and accurate. But in a recent memo, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz insisted that the Web site contractor should only hire journalists who "will not reflect discredit on the U.S. government."
(We pause to reflect on the placing of the name "Wolfowitz" in the same paragraph with "true and accurate")
The Defense Department has hired more than 50 freelance writers for the sites.
Not only is the DoD spreading propaganda, they're hiring third-rate hacks to do it.
Fifty of them.
Back to square one.
|
Yosef informs me I've been nominated for a Koufax - Most Deserving of Wider Recognition - and accuses me of not tooting my own horn.
I didn't even know I had a horn to toot, so I appreciate the heads up.
That's quite an honor - look at all these great blogs.
If I had to choose, I'd pick AmericaBlog. Or Archy.
Or Bark Bark Woof Woof. Or BlondeSense. Or Democratic Veteran!
No, wait - how about the Liberal Coaltion's Fearless Leader, NTodd at Dohiyi Mir?
Ooops, Echidne of the Snakes is my personal snake-protector.
First Draft - that's on my top tier of favorites! But so is Norbizness...and Melanie.
Pen-Elayne is my hero(ine), and Doggerel is my hero.
And what would I do without my daily dose of crap from World O' Crap ?
I give up....blog overload...circuits burning...
I'm too overloaded to vote. Please cast your vote for one of the fine folks to whom I've linked, give me the booby prize, and I'll go quietly to my room.
|
I'm glad to see the Bush administration wants to raise the amount paid to military families following a death in action from $12,420 to $100,000 or more.
It would be nice if we could, at the same time, do more to keep soldiers from dying.
Let's at least answer these questions -
Does every boot on the ground have sufficient body armor?
Are all the vehicles appropriately fitted out and maintained?
How about ammunition? There was a shortage - has that been rectified?
And how about the wounded? Do they still have to pay for their own hospital meals? Do they get job retraining when loss of limb deprives them of their career?
What about salaries? Any military families still on food stamps?
Wouldn't it be nice if the "culture of life" could be expanded to include the living?
|
AARP and I went through a divorce back when they caved to the Bush Medicare prescription plan - a.k.a. The Big Pharma Cash Cow.
But there may be a whiff of reconciliation in the air.
I still get their (mostly excellent) magazine, and the March/April 2005 issue features a big, juicy article titled - "Myths and Truths About Social Security"; subtitled - "Yes, the system needs some adjustments but we don't need to destroy it in order to fix it."
It's not on-line yet, but should be within a week; check back here. The on-line version is subtitled "Yes, the system needs a tune-up, but don't believe those who say we need to tear it down to fix it".
Those we shouldn't believe would be our president and the majority of the House and Senate.
What is AARP telling it's members?
Social Security is the ultimate support system, a monetary cushion for grandmothers and granddads, but also a lifeline for widows, widowers, divorcees, orphans, and people with disabilities. For the average American over 65, Social Security makes up nearly 40 percent of their income. For about 20 percent, it is their only income. The system has worked well for some 70 years now with few adjustments. These days, it's on everyone's radar. That's because President Bush has put Social Security reform at the top of his second-term to-do list. He and many others argue that big changes are necessary if Social Security is to survive, much less thrive. But there are those, AARP included, who believe a radical overhaul could spell disaster - the end of Social Security as we know it.
*Social Security is broke.
*The fund starts getting into trouble in 2018.
*The Social Security reserves are only on paper.
*The 77 million Baby Boomers marching toward retirement are going to break the system.
*A system of private accounts would save Social Security.
*Private accounts will give individuals more control
*Individuals will get higher returns with private accounts.
I liked this quote from David Certner, AARP's director of federal affairs -
"Under privatization, current workers will have to pay three times," says Certner. "Once to ensure the benefits for those currently at or near retirement, once for themselves, and once more for those whose investments didn't pan out."
On AARP's website, Merrill Goozner paints a similar view - "Don’t Mess With Success - There’s nothing wrong with Social Security that a few changes can’t fix"
My personal choice for change would be raising the wage cap; currently, wages over $90,000 are not subject to FICA. "Why not?" is a perfectly valid question to ask our legislators.
AARP is too genteel and civilized to come out and call the Bush administration a pack of greedy, delusional pack of liars, but this is pretty darn close.
|
Thursday, February 03, 2005
"We will pass along to our children all the freedoms we enjoy; and chief among them is freedom from fear." ( SOTU, Feb. 2, 2005)
President George W. Bush's own re-election campaign assumes that Americans are and should be fearful and that safety will be found only in voting Republican. The bottom line has been, and will remain: "You are scared - trust us."
Fear has been used as a basis for curtailing freedom of expression and for questioning legal rights long taken for granted. It has crept into political discourse and been used to discredit patriotic public servants. Ronald Reagan's favourite image, borrowed from an earlier visionary, of America as "a shining city on a hill" has been unnecessarily dimmed by another image: a nation motivated by fear and ready to lash out at any country it defines as the source of a gathering threat.
An unrelenting and unending campaign of fear based on the searing images of September 11 2001 will, at the very least, undermine the optimistic spirit that has sustained America's progress during most of its history. - James Goodby and Kenneth Weisbrode, "Bush's corrosive campaign of fear," Financial Times, 18 November 2003
|
Republicans like to trumpet "personal responsibility" when it comes to health care, but they're definitely blowing out the wrong orifice.
The only actual "responsibility" we have is paying for it.
In comments, Jeff and Kat remind me that as good, God-fearing, personal-responsibility-taking Americans, we really have no control over the "responsibilities" of serious disease or injury.
If I get run over by a truck, the Department of Transportation will not leave me to rot on the side of the road. The EMT's swoop in, scrape me off the pavement, and cart me to an emergency room.
I could scream "NO!!! I want to shop around for a less-expensive form of transportation!" at the top of my (pierced and squashed) lungs, but they'll do it anyway and send me a big bill for it.
Nor will they give me a chance to shop around for the best value in emergency rooms. They'll take me to the nearest hospital qualified to treat my injuries, and the hospital will send me a big bill for it.
How many people, in pain and clinging to life by their fingertips, look into the doctor's eyes and plead - "Please, doc - do your cheapest to save me"?
The same sort of scenario applies for catastrophic illness. How many people shop around for the best value in insurance policies or look for the cheapest treatment when faced with cancer or a stroke or similar serious affliction?
We say "Make me well!"...and damn the expense. When faced with life-threatening illness or injury, who stops to look at what might be cheaper? Does "accepting personal responsibility" force people to do so?
Your health insurance policy might pay a chunk of the bill - if you're lucky - but the health insurance vultures are ripping and shredded away more coverage every day, cheered on by the GOP's "personal responsibility" scam.
When it comes to minor things, like a cold or a scraped knee - we CAN chose between a visit to the doctor or doctoring ourselves. We can also chose not to smoke, exercise regularly, eat tofu instead of hog jowls, and be safety-conscious. But most of the big stuff is out of our control.
When the GOP figures out a way to bulletproof the population from serious health problems and guarantee preventative care to all, THEN they can begin to sneak "personal responsibility" back into the dialogue.
|
Wednesday, February 02, 2005
Koufax nominations here.
"Best New Blog" should be a no-brainer. Hurry over and vote for "Why Now?"
|
One more time, with gusto - our system DOES...NOT...WORK.
Keep in mind Republicans want to shift even MORE of the expenses onto the patient.
Half of all U.S. bankruptcies are caused by soaring medical bills and most people sent into debt by illness are middle-class workers with health insurance, researchers said Wednesday.
(snip)
"Our study is frightening. Unless you're Bill Gates you're just one serious illness away from bankruptcy," said Dr. David Himmelstein, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School who led the study. "Most of the medically bankrupt were average Americans who happened to get sick. Health insurance offered little protection."
(snip)
Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a Harvard associate professor and physician who advocates for universal health coverage, said the study supported demands for health reform.
"Covering the uninsured isn't enough. We must also upgrade and guarantee continuous coverage for those who have insurance," Woolhandler said in a statement.
She said many employers and politicians were pressing for what she called "stripped-down plans so riddled with co-payments, deductibles and exclusions that serious illness leads straight to bankruptcy."
|
It's February 2, which brings along a seven-degrees-of-separation-type situation; at least, in my mind.
February 2nd is Groundhog Day - the little fellow reportedly saw his shadow, therefore six more weeks of winter weather. And by golly, we're under another winter storm watch.
February 2nd being Groundhog Day - we're having hog jowls for supper. No, not groundhog jowls. You can come back out, buddy.
February 2nd is the celebration of Candlemas - Wives' Feast Day. Disgusting as they sound, this wife likes hog jowls, and we'll be feasting on them this evening.
February 2nd is our 26th wedding anniversary; therefore, the "feast".
February 2, 1979; Day One at Who's The Boss? Husband-Training School:
Unexpected cake in the face. Ha-ha; very funny.
The terrible, swift sword of justice strikes. Up yer nose, baby!
He's been a model of husbandly good behavior since that moment.
|
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Does anyone have any knowledge or experience with digital phone service?
Time Warner Cable will soon be offering it in our area; on the surface, it sounds like a good deal.
For $39.95 per month, you get unlimited long distance, unlimited in-state calls, unlimited local calls, plus caller ID, call waiting, and call forwarding. You keep your phone number, and voice mail is an additional $3.95 per month.
Sounds too good to be true, but I'd like to hear any opinions.
|
That's an early-bird record for me, the last of the great tax procrastinators.
Of course, when there's not much to file, there's not much of a problem.
|
When it comes to spying, Donald Rumsfeld is an impatient man. The Defense Secretary hated having to wait for CIA spooks to make arrangements with Afghanistan's warlords before his special-operations commandos could infiltrate the country ahead of the 2001 U.S. invasion. These days Rumsfeld is even less inclined to depend on the CIA. Instead, he is pushing his generals to field a larger and more aggressive clandestine force to spy on terrorists worldwide and attack them.
Got your man right here, R -
Colonel Flagg, the nuisance from M*A*S*H
Colonel Flagg did everything he felt was necessary to protect "the American way of life" and win the war. For him, this task included selling penicillin for information and having a wounded North Korean operated on so that he could face execution later. Flagg always had his own ridiculous conspiracy theories and even more ridiculous plans.
"Nobody can get the truth out of me because even I don't know what it is. I keep myself in a constant state of utter confusion."
He should fit right in.
|
"The fight over Social Security is, above all, about what kind of society we want to have."
This isn't an "overhaul", but a radical restructuring of the system, shifting the burden from employers and health insurers onto patients.
Emboldened by their success at the polls, the Bush administration and Republican leaders in Congress believe they have a new opportunity to move the nation away from the system of employer-provided health insurance that has covered most working Americans for the last half-century.
In its place, they want to erect a system in which workers — instead of looking to employers for health insurance — would take personal responsibility for protecting themselves and their families: They would buy high-deductible "catastrophic" insurance policies to cover major medical needs, then pay routine costs with money set aside in tax-sheltered health savings accounts.
In this household, I can guarantee you we wouldn't be using that tax-sheltered health savings account unless a condition became critical. Those "routine costs" can mount up to break-the-bank levels very quickly, and we'd be extremely unlikely to draw on the account unless it were literally a matter of life and death.
Routine, recommended yearly procedures? Forget about it. For a list of routine, recommended yearly procedures, click here.
The colonoscopy alone, at our local hospital, runs $1,400. That's for the procedure itself, and doesn't include the radiologist and lab fees which easily add several hundred dollars.
The procedures I'm most familiar with - cholesterol screenings, mammogram, and PAP smear - would quite easily top $600 to $1000 per year, and I'm quite aware our prices are lower than many parts of the country.
Patients are already shouldering a larger part of routine expenses through higher deductibles and co-pays. Yet the GOP thinks we need to pay more, employers need to pay less, and health insurance companies don't need to pay anything at all for preventative care.
Relatively few people actually need catastrophic insurance, though it's certainly recommended to have it. However, catastrophic claims account for less than half of 1 percent of all claims, yet generate 20 percent of the nation's health care costs. The Republican scheme reserves this small piece of health care cost for insurance companies, leaving patients holding the rest of the bag.
"Health savings accounts all aim at empowering people to make decisions for themselves, owning their own healthcare plan," the president said. Consumer-driven decision-making is more likely to control costs than having bills paid by a third party, such as an employer, he added.
|
I've posted my third grade school picture in the sidebar.
It won World's Worst Elementary School Picture by a vote of 100-0-1; my mother abstaining.
|
Monday, January 31, 2005
Abstinence-only sex education programs, a major plank in President Bush's education plan, have had no impact on teenagers' behavior in his home state of Texas, according to a new study.
Despite taking courses emphasizing abstinence-only themes, teenagers in 29 high schools became increasingly sexually active, mirroring the overall state trends, according to the study conducted by researchers at Texas A&M University.
Note to wingers from the reality-based community:
Any parent of an adolescent knows the best way to get them to do something is to forbid them from doing it, and vice-versa.
It's been that way since adolescents were invented, and no amount of denial will change it.
|
"State of Union speech could have war theme"
And the subheader -
"Past wartime presidents have framed it as enemy vs. us"
By the way, Junior - where is Osama, the supposed reason for this mess in Iraq and the rationale behind shredding the Constitution?
|
Archy has come up with a splendid idea – a Bad History Carnival. Read the concept, and judge for yourself.
Man, where to begin?
One could enumerate the countless ways the neocons have distorted or ignored history to advance their own twisted agenda, but I don’t have either the time or patience to get into THAT can of worms; not today.
I do welcome the opportunity to blast one of my favorite movies and ironically, a huge historical screw-up.
When Mel Gibson took on the project of bringing the story of William Wallace to the big screen, I cheered lustily – a lot of that “lust” had something to do with Gibson himself portraying Wallace.
For me, waiting for Braveheart was almost as painful as waiting for Lord of the Rings. Gibson assured the world the story would be historically accurate as possible.
That "as possible" part turned more into "anything goes". While the gist of the story is more-or-less correct, important details are either horribly wrong or omitted entirely.
Romanticizing the losing side is all well and good, especially when the losing side had a valid argument and their champion and his adherents showed great courage and bravery. But for Pete's sake, can we at least make the losing side's story more reasonable?
Speaking of Wallace’s adherents, Mr. Andante’s 22nd great-grandfather was Sir Nichol Rothirforde, of whom it is written -
It is believed that Sir Nichol was connected with Wallace through the Hallidays. Thomas Halliday was a nephew of Wallace, and a friend of Rothirforde. Previous to the Battle of Biggar, as narrated by Harry the Minstrel, Halliday brought his uncle a welcome contingent of three hundred "wee armed" warriors from Annandale, led by "twa gud sonnis, Wallas and Rudyrfurd " Among the chiefs who remained faithful to Wallace was "gud Rudyrfurd, chyftaynlik" with a lordly air, who with sixty followers held his ground against the English in Ettrick Forest.
Sir Nichol de Rothirforde held considerable land located in several different counties. His land of Doddington Mill in Northumberland was seized by the English King in 1296 as Sir Nichol was declared a rebel.
My own ancestry goes back to the villainous Edward I (“Longshanks”), Wallace’s nemesis; which all gives rise to the title of our family tree – “How The Mighty Have Fallen”.
I still love the beautiful musical score, the stunning cinematography, and gritty realism of Braveheart’s battles. It’s a story worth telling – and worth telling correctly.
There are so many screw-ups it’s hard to choose; but the most outrageous has got to be the idea of an affair between Princess Isabelle and Wallace and the idea that Wallace was the father of her first child.
It’s physically impossible, historically irresponsible, and just plain too stupid to go into.
So – am I by myself on this one?
What fantastical twist outraged you the most? The idea that 13th century Scotland was a backward, barbaric country?
In many ways, 13th century Scotland made 21st century America look like the Stone Age.
Or maybe the idea that Wallace – younger son of a landed Scottish knight – was a poor peasant farmer living in a sod hut?
Or the Battle of Stirling Bridge fought on an open field with no bridge in sight?
Or that Scottish warriors charged into battle wearing only sleeveless shirts revealing muscular arms and a kilt….ummmm, let’s allow that one – it’s one of my favorite parts of the movie.
Braveheart won a lot of awards, made a lot of money, and even influenced an election. But in many ways, it disgraced the history and culture of a great people.
|
Saturday, January 29, 2005
Depending on the circumstances, he told the intelligence agency, some coercive methods could be legal, but he advised against others, the officials said.
Apparently, Bush loyalists are thick on the ground - it's just hard to find one that has, you know, any real moral values.
|
Our forecast for the day includes this -
This is a very dangerous winter weather situation. Travel in the warning area is not recommended from later this morning through Sunday afternoon. If you leave the safety of indoors... you are putting your life at risk. Accumulations of ice may result in widespread power outages. Preparations should be completed as soon as possible. Be sure you have enough fuel for alternate heating sources such as gas heaters and fireplaces. Make sure that any space heaters or candles are kept well away from flammable objects... and keep them out of the reach of children. Stock up on batteries and have flashlights handy. Be sure you have enough medicine and food that does not require cooking or refrigeration.
Can we all join hands and pray the electrical power doesn't go off? Fifteen minutes without electricity reduces me to a quivering mass of hysteria.
I know; I'm a wimp. But at least I'm a totally cool wimp.
|
Greg and Mustang Bobby point me to an on-line quiz - "Are You A Loser?", and I'm all set to proclaim, "I'm A Loser, Loud And Proud".
But guess what?
And I was so sure my "age category" (51-115 years) would damn me to everlasting loser-dom.
Must have something to do with my lack of tatoos.
|
Friday, January 28, 2005
It’s time for Mr. Andante’s annual checkup with the family doctor, and therefore time for the annual Fretting Over The Rectal Exam.
Alas, I am less than sympathetic to my Dearly Beloved’s concerns in that regard.
As I tell him every year, when the doctor sticks his hand up his butt and yanks out an eight pound mass of screaming baby, THEN I’ll sympathize.
In case you’re keeping score, here’s the list of recommended yearly tests -
Men -
Eye exam
Dental exam
Blood pressure measurement
Cholesterol test
Colon exam
Prostate exam
Testicular exam
Women –
Body Mass Index
Blood pressure
Cholesterol
Eye exam
Dental exam
Skin exam
PAP smear
Breast exam and mammogram
Colonoscopy
Bone mineral density test
In case you’re keeping score, here’s the list of health insurers that provide 100% coverage for all those tests:
|
Automated messages to constituents in dozens of districts accuse several Republicans in Congress of trying to jeopardize the retirement program
In a sign of the political dangers surrounding President Bush's plans for Social Security, a number of congressional Republicans said Thursday that their constituents had received anonymous, automated phone calls accusing the lawmakers of trying to damage the government retirement program by "privatizing" it.
House Republicans said the calls, which they labeled a "tele-scare campaign," had been made in more than a dozen congressional districts from Connecticut to Florida.
(snip)
On Capitol Hill, Republicans were outraged.
"They won't even identify themselves," Greg Crist, a spokesman for the House Republican Conference, said of the unknown backer of the phone campaign. "At the very least, they ought to fess up."
Republicans are running scared. Tighten the screws on the privatizers before they screw American citizens!
|
Krugman effectively and succinctly demolishes the latest Bush shot in the dark at Social Security as a bad deal for African-Americans:
...the deal African-Americans get from Social Security turns out, according to various calculations, to be either about the same as that for whites or somewhat better. Hispanics, by the way, clearly do better than either.
Bring it on.
***
E.J. Dionne on John Edwards' Gamble -
Democrats should speak with conviction about an issue that has always animated them: the alleviation of poverty. "I think it is a moral issue; it's something we should be willing to fight about and stand up for," he says.
Those who counsel caution, he says, would let calculation push Democrats away from their historical commitments. "They think it's associated with some political label," he says, carefully avoiding the L-word himself. "They think that a lot of people who live in poverty don't vote and don't participate and so they don't think there's a lot of political capital there."
But there are degrees or areas of poverty in many people's lives, even in people who consider themselves "middle class".
There's the poverty of retirement. How do you view your prospects of "golden years" if Social Security is jerked out from under you and your pension plan or other retirement funds have dried up?
There's the poverty of health care. Will a major illness or accident throw you into bankrupcy?
There's the poverty of higher education; for you, your children, or grandchildren. Is college tuition a nightmare that blocks you from the American dream?
Edwards, who is planning to set up a center to study ways to alleviate poverty, is enough of a politician to insist that he wants to advocate not only on behalf of the destitute but also for those just finding their footing on mobility's ladder. But he offers the unexpected claim that the very voters who have strayed from the Democrats would respond forcefully to the moral imperative of aiding the poor.
"The people who love their guns and love their faith, they care about this," Edwards says. "There is a deep abiding feeling of moral responsibility people have about those who are doing everything right and are still having a hard time."
If Edwards can speak to those of us who face broken rungs on that mobility ladder, he may be on to something.
|
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Health insurance companies have been having their way with Americans for a long, long time - and laughing all the way to the bank.
I don't blame the Bush administration for it entirely - just Republicans in general.
So, I'm filling out an application for an extortionate individual policy with Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and they want a very detailed listing of our medical history with any procedures performed, medication prescribed, and the outcome.
And I come to this questions:
Has anyone on this application ever had sinusitis?
I wrote "Who hasn't?"
If they reject us for that answer, I'll sue the bejeezus out of them.
You can take that frivolous lawsuit and shove it up your tort reform.
|
America's face to the world

The Peter Principle triumphs again.
She of too-many-screw-ups-to-count is elevated.
On the other hand, considering how irrelevant Foggy Bottom has become, perhaps this is the least harmful spot for the girl.
|
Here it is in a nutshell - giving proven incompetents the "benefit of the doubt", caving to phony wartime "patriotism", refusing to challenge the concept of the War On Terra, and lacking any sort of spine.
I have always liked Joe Lieberman; I'd love to have him as a next door neighbor, and in my opinion he is the legally elected vice-president of the United States.
But he's an embarrassment to the loyal opposition.
Lieberman Statement on Nomination of Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State - Jan 25, 2005
Mr. President: I have always believed that our responsibility to advise and consent does not mean that we have to agree with every opinion or every action that the nominee has ever taken, but that that nominee deserves the benefit of the doubt and that our responsibility is to determine whether the nominee is fit for the position for which the President has nominated him or her and whether the nominee, in our judgment, will serve in the national interest. And I conclude that Dr. Condoleezza Rice meets that standard, at least, and much more.
Secondly, this element of the context in which this nomination is put before us: we are at war. It is a war unlike any we have ever fought before. And here I speak of the world war with Islamic terrorism. It is joined on battlefield in places like Iraq, of course, but it is being fought in the shadows and corners against an enemy that is driven by a fanaticism and acts without regard to human life – others’ or their own.
I embrace the best tradition of American foreign policy that always has said that partisanship should end at the nation’s shores. And note that it doesn’t say policy differences should end. It doesn’t say ideological differences should end. It says partisanship should end at the nation’s shores, particularly so when our nation is engaged in a war – a global war on terrorism, a war in Iraq in which Americans have already lost their lives in the cause of freedom and in protection of our security.
The nomination of a Secretary of State in a second term of a president naturally is an opportunity, appropriately, for people to raise questions about the foreign policy of that Administration. But in the final analysis I hope it is also an opportunity around this very qualified nominee for us to come together and say to one another and to the world – both our enemies and our allies – that in the final analysis Americans will stand together, shoulder to shoulder, against terrorism – against the enemy – in pursuit of the freedom and liberty and opportunity that Dr. Rice spoke of in her opening statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and that President Bush spoke to in his Inaugural Address last week.
One of the great strengths that Condoleezza Rice will bring to the office of Secretary of State is that the world knows that she has the President’s trust and confidence and I respect the right of any of my colleagues to reach a different decision today and to oppose this nomination. But I hope and believe that the Senate today, across partisan lines, will resoundingly endorse this nomination and send the message to friend and foe alike that while we have our disagreements, ultimately what unites us around this very qualified nominee in this hour of war is much greater than what divides us.
In times like these it is important that the world not only knows that this Secretary of State has the ear of the President, but that she has – if you will allow me to put it this way – America’s heart. A heart that beats with the freedom and security and opportunity that we dream of for our own people and for the people of the world.
|
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
The cheerleaders for Bush's privatized Social Security phase-out scheme obviously haven't had to scrimp and save for college tuition, only to see their funds eaten away by poor stock market performance.
My oldest nephew entered college in the fall of 2000 with a very healthy portfolio that was calculated to get him through four full years plus two for graduate school and enough left over to start his own business.
He started his junior year working part-time at McDonald's to make up the shortfall.
He graduated in May by the skin of his (financial) teeth. There's nothing left for graduate school or starting a business or even buying a new suit to wear to job interviews.
Can you get rich investing in the market? Sure.
Can you predict what your investments will be yielding when you retire? No way.
If you're unlucky enough to retire when the market is on the downswing, you'll be competing with financially strapped college students for those hamburger flipping jobs.
|
Monday, January 24, 2005
U.S. Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Contaminated; apparently with something like mouse-cooties. Follow the link for the science.
In August 2001, the Bush Administration set a new policy for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. President Bush declared that federal research funds could only be used on embryonic stem cell lines created before that date; at the time, several of the President’s scientific advisors believed that there were approximately 78 viable cell lines in existence and they would be sufficient for investigators to advance the embryonic stem cell field. President Bush argued that his new policy would prevent the creation and subsequent destruction of new embryos solely for the purpose of extracting stem cells. Moreover, in August 2001, researchers only had the technology to grow human embryonic stem cells using mouse “feeder cell” lines, therefore all the lines covered under the President’s policy are contaminated with mouse cells or mouse cell products. (link)
(emphasis mine)
Add "several of the President's scientific advisors" to the long list of criminally incompetent jackasses who run this administration.
|
The United States has still only spent a small portion of the $18.4 billion (9.8 billion pounds) it set aside for rebuilding Iraq and is being forced to reallocate funding from some projects because of the poor security situation, a new government report shows.
According to a copy of the Bush administration's latest quarterly update to Congress on Iraq obtained by Reuters on Thursday, as of December 29 only $2.2 billion of the funds had actually been spent.
Bill Pullman (President): I don't understand, where does all this come from? How do you get funding for something like this?
Judd Hirsch (Julius Levinson): You don't actually think they spend $20,000.00 on a hammer, $30,000.00 on a toilet seat do you?
Pentagon officials said they established the Strategic Support Branch using "reprogrammed" funds, without explicit congressional authority or appropriation.
Answer - War in Iraq
Question - How can Donald Rumsfeld and his merry bunch of lunatics get the money and power to pursue their own fantasies of world domination?
|
Sunday, January 23, 2005
...and doing more than a little screaming. I am seriously tired of cold temperatures, snow, ice, wind, and all the other wonders of winter.
Tired, too, of traveling....whether by air or road. Gotta deliver the kid back to college in the morning - the roads were impassable today - and I'm not looking forward to it.
I am most heartily sick and tired of right-wing, fundamentalist jackasses picking on cartoon characters to shove their agenda down our throats.
Especially when the cartoon character is one so innocuous as SpongeBob. Full disclosure - I've been a fan for years. It's one of those cartoons akin to Rocky and Bullwinkle or Rocko's Modern Life; the jokes often go completely over the kiddie's heads but they're hilarious to those of us with a semi-warped sense of humor.
Two goodbyes - Johnny Carson and Rose Mary Woods.
I vaguely remember Jack Paar, but Johnny was the Tonight Show host when the show was no longer past my bedtime. Good night, Johnny.
As to Rose Mary; as one who has done secretarial work much of my working life I respect the desire to protect the boss, but Rose Mary took it just a bit over the line when she "inadvertently erased part of a crucial Watergate tape".
"Inadvertently", my butt.
Nixon biographer Jonathan Aitken said the two hit it off immediately. Nixon, elected to the Senate in 1950, hired Woods as his secretary.
"She was intelligent, literate, clamlike in her discretion. Technically superb, she possessed the high-speed skills of shorthand and typing necessary to keep up with her boss's often frantic and always demanding schedule," Aitken wrote.
(snip)
She denied she caused the full 181/2-minute gap, testifying later that she inadvertently erased four or five minutes. The phone rang while she was transcribing the tape, she said.
She accidentally hit the record button. A picture in which she demonstrated her action -- stretching one foot forward while reaching back to get the phone -- became one of the most famous images of the era.
When Rose Mary gets to Secretary Heaven or Hell (whichever prefers her) maybe she can give a more credible explanation.
|


